Team AI capability training
Tools don't make a team capable; transferred skill does.
I spent eighteen years as a coach finding out why skill fails to transfer — experts teach a description of what they do, and the students get the blame. Most AI training fails exactly that way: a demo, a cheat sheet, and three weeks later nobody’s workflow has changed.
I train teams the way I coached crews: extract how your best people actually work, encode it into cues and workflows the rest can use, and build the feedback loop that makes it stick. The evidence on what AI does to skill — when it moves novices up the curve, and when it quietly erodes experts — is research I’ve published.
Questions
Why does most AI training fail?
A demo, a cheat sheet, and three weeks later nobody's workflow has changed. The skill never transferred, because nobody extracted it first — experts teach a description of what they do, and the students get the blame.
What do you do differently?
I train teams the way I coached crews: extract how your best people actually work, encode it into cues and workflows the rest can use, and build the feedback loop that makes it stick.
Is this tool training?
No. Tools change. What I build is your team's judgement about working with AI, grounded in the published evidence on what AI does to skill.